The costs of straying from optimal strategy
Not long ago, some readers revealed why they deviated from the optimal strategy in a play. I let them tell their story by delaying comments.
It’s my turn.
A blackjack player, explained that he didn't split or double down if he had to buy more chips. He won't play to set his buyback as a session limit and force it to exceed that limit.
I'm all for setting limits when you bet. It's important to keep within your means without betting on money you can't lose.
You may want to double down the pair without exceeding the limit, or avoid entering an indivisible position. If you still have $10 of session bankrolls on the blackjack table with a minimum bet of $10, I'll walk rather than make the last bet.
If I'm 8-8 against 5 points for my last 10 bucks, my average result is a loss if I stand or bump, but a win if I split. It costs to discipline yourself to avoid buying more chips.
It gets tricky because you can pair up again and make a decision on the leaflet or draw 3-8 and want a double down.
My request is to lower the limit and buy enough chips to cover a split or double in that hand and then leave if you don't win. But if you need a harder limit to discipline yourself against excessive spending, that's your request. Bankroll discipline is sometimes more likely to limit revenue opportunities or even suffer losses with one hand, but it is commendable.
Quarter video poker players who like Ten Play often play 9-5 double bonus poker. When she receives a full house with three aces, she only holds the ace and throws the other pair away in the one-handed game, but holds a full house in Ten Play. She hesitates to give up a certain 450/4 payoff, and risks agreeing on 150 coins for 10/3 of the kind.
Blackjack Bankroll dilemma, I'll make a different choice but I understand Kerry's position. If she owns all 10 full houses in the quarter machine, she is guaranteed $112.50. If she goes to the full house to be pulled into the ace, she risks losing her pay to $37.50. 바다이야기
The big drop will happen often. However, if she wins a fourth ace with one hand for paying 800 coins, her total payback jumps to 935 coins, or $233.75. Sometimes, the fourth ace will be accompanied by two, three, or four, pulling the hand up to 2,000 coin jackpots.
If that happens with one of the 10 hands, the total salary jumps to $533.75. Once a blue moon, you'll draw your fourth ace with more than one hand, with or without a low kicker.
The average yield per hand for dismantling a full house to hold three aces is 63.58 for 5s or more, and 61.36 for discarding two 2s, 3s or 4s per hand. Either way, the average yield dwarfed a flat coin of 45 coins per hand in a full house.
I understand that it is difficult for players betting in the betting quarter to give up their guaranteed return of $112.50. However, the difference in reward potential is so large that you can take risks. If you can't handle the risk, preserving bankrolls is the most important concern, but it might be better to conserve bankrolls using fewer hands at a time to reduce bets.
